听雨's profile静河听雨BlogListsGuestbook Tools Help

Blog


    10/31/2009

    Notes fo a history of Philosophy(2)

    Instead of debating alternative theories of nature, philosophers addressed the problem of human knowledge, asking whether it was possible to discover any universal truth.
    How knowledge is acquired and how humans might order their behavior.
    Protagoras: man is the measure of all things, of the things that are,that they are,and of the things that are not, that they are not.
    The knowledge is relative to each person.
    Gorgias: nothing exists; that if anything exists it is incomprehensible, and that even if it is comprehensible, it cannot be communicated.
    Thrasymachus: injustice is to be preferred to the life of justice.
    Socrates: Knowledge is virtue.
    The soul as that within us in virtue of which we are pronounced wise or foolish, good or bad.
    Our greatest concern should be the proper care of our souls when we understand the difference between fact and fancy, and thereby build our Thought upon a knowledge of what human life is really like .having attained such knowledge, those who have the proper care of their soul in mind will conduct their behavior in accordance with their knowledge of true moral values.
    The surest way to attain reliable knowledge was through the practice of disciplined conversation, with this conversation acting as an intellectual midwife.
    By progressively correcting incomplete or inaccurate notions, we could coax the truth out of anyone.
    No unexamined idea is worth having any more than the unexamined life is worth living.
    The variety of facts around us could yield clear and fixed concepts, so long as we employ the technique of analysis and difinition.
    Behind the world of facts, then, Socrates believed there was an order in things that we could discover.
    To know the good is to do the good, that knowledge is virtue.
    10/29/2009

    Notes of a history of Philosophy(1)

    What are things really like ?
    How can we explain the process of change in things?
    The important thing to keep in mind , though , is that Greek philosophy from the start wae an intellectual activity , and philosophy meant thinking about basic questions with an attitude of genuine and free inquiry.
    Thales raised the question concerning the nature of the world ,the answer is water.
    The primary substance out of which all these specific things come , Anaximander argued , is an indefinite or boundless realm.
    Anaximmenes designated air as the primary substance from which all things come.
    The real significance of the Milesians is ,again ,that they for the first time raised the question about the ultimate nature of things and made the first halting but direct inquiry into what nature really consists of .
    In Pythagoras' opinion, all things are numbers.
    The problem of change.  all things are in flux ,and you cannot step into the same river. Heraclitus thought that "it is wise to agree that all things are one ," that the One takes shape and appears in many forms.
    Change and multiplicity , Parmenides said, involve a confusion between appearance and reality . Appearance cannot produce more than opinion , whereas reality is the basis of truth.
    Zeno felt strongly that our senses give us no clue about reality but only about appearances. Accordingly , our senses do not give us reliable knowledge but only opinion.
    Empedocles argued that being is not One but many . It is the many which are changeless and eternal .
    The world and all its objects are well-ordered and intricate structures ; there must , then ,be some being with knowledge and power that organizes the material world in this fashion . Such a rational principle is what aAnaxagoras proposed in his concept of Mind , or nous.
    The central contention of Atomism , namely , that everything is made up of atoms moving in empty space.
     
     
    10/26/2009

    静河听雨

    思来想去,最终把MSN和QQ签名改成静河听雨。
    独自一个人,无事要做的时候,总会想:我在做什么。为了生活而奔波,难道就是为了生存而迷失吗?存在何以可能?对这个问题的思考,本身就已经假定了一个存在者。
    跳跃的思维加上极低的悟性,使我很难摆脱那些陈芝麻、烂谷子,可能人本来就无法摆脱有限的肉体对追求无限的灵魂的限制。
    生存就像一把达摩克里斯之剑,悬挂于你的头上。
    从非理性开始,到非理性结束,而在此过程中又要求保持理性,没有比这更荒谬的。
    办公室外边的浴缸在不停地打氧,水在哗哗地流淌,时不时地给我的错觉是外面下雨了。回想起在小河边,听着小雨哗啦落下,不紧不慢,没有开始,似乎也不必考虑结束,仅此而已。
    10/24/2009

    语言乃存在之家

       转帖自博客“守望春天”
       
          语言乃存在之家,这个命题是后现代哲学家常常论及的。此语言之说犹如柏拉图之理念,黑格尔之逻辑,有着客观唯心的色彩。哲学归根结底是讨论物质与意识,存在与思维的学问,在没有新的生产力代表出现的情形下,当今时代普遍认为物质或存在处于第一性,处于决定地位,因而哲学发展到马克思的历史唯物辨证法的阶段已近终结,现代人的思想则是游荡于马克思的胡须丛中。常常说及上帝的死亡,自我的死亡,内心的死亡,其实是哲学死亡的另类说法,理性精神的幻灭。自叔本华至福柯,中间有尼采、柏格森、维特根斯坦,此类非理性的典范代表在面对现实之时,或是强调意志,或是依靠直觉,或是以人生为实验对象,将视角转向自我与内心,或是积极乐观,或是消沉低迷,这些人的个人生活迥异于古典哲学的代表,如康德、黑格尔,康德最是极端,一生犹如钟表的摆动,每天的生活有条不紊,按时饮食,按时出门散步,以致附近的居民可以根据他的出现辨别时间,唯有两次没有按时出现,一次生病,另一次是死亡。尼采是极有才华的哲学家,他的思想更多的是断章式的思考,不成体系,没有框架,文字如同浪漫的诗篇,充满澎湃的激情。哲学迸发火花如此。其实应该对比福柯,二人如同前赴后继的波浪。语言在此类人的生活之中,犹如庄子解牛之刃,游刃有余是其快乐之本。

          语言诞生于遥远的蛮荒之际,在我看来,人类的第一个词语必然是“妈”字,无论是东方还是西方,黑人或是白人,发出其音相同。音近于儿童吮咂母乳,因而始有母系社会,后有父系社会。语言不仅是工具更是人生的一种存在方式。人类通过感知认识世界,通过语言区别万物,形成观念。当我们到人世之初,语言的洪流就将我们湮没了,我们生活在语言之中,我们对世界的认知通过语言,当我们发现新的东西,用语言将它们固定下来,沉入思想之中。通向世界之途必经语言之途。从此层面来说:语言乃存在之家。

          语言并不是通常的文字,形诸笔端的文字的产生远晚于语言,几种古老的文字各异,并直接影响不同文明的生成。不想去思辨如此大的主题。语言在这个世界有着不同形式,线条之于画家,音符之于音乐家,文字之于写作者,肢体形象之于舞蹈者,归纳抽象后皆可以言之为语言。

           语言照进现实,使现实生出光辉。在语言之中漂流,犹如在阳光之中漂流。尽管难以达到真理,尽管现实被蒙蔽,唯有语言能够揭开蒙娜丽莎的微笑,使其明朗。语言在趋于完美的途中,语言是永恒的诗意的栖居之所。选一首北岛关于语言的哲理诗,其中的意蕴颇丰。

                                                     语言

                                                     北岛

    许多种语言
    在这世界飞行
    碰撞,产生了火星
    有时是仇恨
    有时是爱情

    理性的大厦
    正无声地陷落
    竹篾般单薄的思想
    编成的篮子
    盛满盲目的毒蘑

    那些岩画上的走兽
    踏着花朵驰去
    一棵蒲公英秘密地
    生长在某个角落
    风带走了它的种子

    许多种语言
    在这世界飞行
    语言的产生
    并不能增加或减轻
    人类沉默的痛苦

    10/22/2009

    选择和悔恨

           悔恨的前提是假定有选择的自由。一个人在可以作出正确选择的情况下,却作了错误的选择,并且身受其祸,便会感到悔恨。如果无可选择,即使祸害发生,感到的也不是悔恨,而只是悲伤。悲伤面对的是单纯的事实,悔恨却包含着复杂的推理,它在事情发生之后追溯其原因,审视过去的行为,设想别种可能性,而它的全部努力就在于证明已经发生的事情原是可以避免的。
      再进一步,当一个选择的后果不仅关涉到自己而且关涉到他人尤其是自己所爱的人的命运时,悔恨中必定还包含着内疚,并且被这内疚强化。内疚是因为意识到自己对于选择及其后果的伦理责任而感到的痛苦。如果只是自食其果,与他人无干,就只会悔恨,不会内疚。
         

     那么,悔恨是否一种源于性格弱点的情感,而这种弱点在男人身上更为常见?

      我确实发现,在面临人生灾难和重大抉择的时刻,女人往往比男人理智。她们同样悲痛难当,但她们能够不让感情蒙蔽理智。这也许是因为,男人的理智是逻辑,与感情异质,容易在感情的冲击下溃散;女人的理智是直觉,与感情同质,所以能够在感情的汹涌中保持完好无损。

    也许可以说,男人站得高些,视野宽些,所以容易瞻前顾后,追悔往事,忧虑未来。但是,女人的状态是更健康的,她们更贴近生命的自然之道。当男人为亲人的去世痛心疾首时,女人嘹亮地抚尸恸哭,然后利索地替尸体洗浴更衣,送亲人踏上通往天国的路。

     
     
          全或无——一个多么简明的公式,又是一个多么幼稚的公式!在这个非此即彼的公式中,生命固有的缺陷、苦难、辛酸被一笔勾销了。一个自命对人生有相当觉悟的人怎会有这等幼稚的信仰呢?"全"只是理想,现实总是不"全"的,有缺陷的。凡不能接受这缺陷的,自己该归于"无",为什么我仍在世上苟活?
     
          悔恨是一种事后的聪明。在悔恨者眼里,往事是一目了然的。他已经忘记了当初选择时错综复杂的困境和另一种可能的选择的恶果。此时此刻,已实现的这种选择的恶果使他成了那种未实现的选择的狂信者。他相信,如果允许他重新选择,他将不会有丝毫犹豫。 
     
          选择的困难在于,一个人永远不可能依靠自身的经验来对不同的选择作比较。无论当时,还是事后,比较都是在想象中进行的。一旦作出一个选择,即意味着排除了其余一切可能的选择,从而也排除了经验它们的可能性。在作出选择之后,选择的困境丝毫没有消除,迟早会转化为反省的困境再度折磨我们。关于这一点,克尔凯郭尔说过一句很准确的话:"在反省的海洋上,我们无法向任何人呼救,因为每一个救生圈都是辩证的。"所以,当一个人面临不可逃脱的厄运时,无论他怎么选择,悔恨已是他的宿命。所谓两害相权取其轻,这轻重怎么衡量?只要你取了,受了,那身受之害永远是最重的!
     
           人生有种种选择。对于幸运儿来说,选择是面对诸多机会的主动进取。对于冒险家来说,选择是孤注一掷的赌博。对于苦难者来说,选择却是不可自拔的困境。
      山谷里的路分成几股1每一股都通往一座宝山,区别只在于宝藏的多少。在这种情况下,我选路时也许颇费斟酌,也许不假思索,我的心情也许兴奋,也许放松,都谈不上选择的困境。
      我站在悬崖上,对面是一座宝山,中间隔着无底深渊。悬崖离宝山只有一箭步之遥,如果纵身一跃,可能跳上宝山,也可能跌下深渊。在这种情况下,我也许冒险一试,也许转身走开,仍然谈不上选择的困境。如果背后有追兵断了我的退路,我不跳必死,跳有一半希望跃上对面的山头获救,则我多半会跳。这已是一种困境,但不甚严重,选择毕竟是容易的。
      我仍然站在悬崖上,背后是追兵,面前是深渊,但并无可供我冒险一跳的另一座山。我要逃避追兵,就只有葬身深渊。我若拒绝跳崖,就只有死于追兵之手。这时我才真正陷入了两难之境。
      由此可见,选择的困境包含两个要素:第一,选择不可逃避;第二,可供选择的方案均不能接受。也就是说,这是一种既不能逃避又无法进行的选择。欲作选择,进退维谷,欲不作选择,又骑虎难下。由于诸方案在同等程度上不可接受,使选择失去了实际意义。然而,不作选择则意味着诸方案之一仍将自动实现。在这样一种困境中,命运的概念便油然而生。由于选择的权利是虚假的,人们就拒绝承担选择的义务,听天由命,把选择的困境还原为一种命定的厄运了。苦难者不再摆出选择的夸张姿势,宁愿神情麻木地站在受难的高冈上,因为麻木就是他的本来面目。
      大卫王获罪上苍,耶和华便命他在饥荒、瘟疫、战祸三种灾难中选择一种。仁慈的耶和华并不直接降灾于他,而是先把选择作为一种更严厉的惩罚强加于他。选择意味着责任,耶和华藉此把本该由他自己承担的责任转嫁给无辜的人类了。聪明的大卫王拒绝承担这个责任,他说:"我很为难。我宁肯落在耶和华手里,因为他有丰盛的怜悯,不愿落在人手里。"他用谦卑的奉顺堵住了耶和华的嘴,巧妙地把选择之球抛回给了那和华,即抛回给了冥冥中的命运之神。于是,有着丰盛的怜悯的耶和华便降瘟疫于以色列国,使七万人死于非命。当然,这七万冤魂是没有理由责备他们的国王的,因为这灾祸乃是天命,而非大卫王的选择。
      事实上,大卫王还是作了某种选择,他不愿落在人手里,从而排除了战祸。《圣经》以此讽刺人类的残忍往往要超过无常的大自然。一个恰当的例子是《苏菲的选择》。法西斯匪徒抓住了一个母亲和她的两个孩子,决定当着她的面杀死两个孩子。在行刑前最后一刻,匪徒突然允许她留下其中一个孩子,命她作出选择。她当然无法选择。但这个选择是不允许拒绝的,如果拒绝,两个孩子都要被杀死。于是,选择转换成了这样的形式:是丧失一个孩子,还是丧失两个孩子?对于任何一个有清醒理智的人来说,在这两者之中作出选择都并不困难,保存一于总比两子皆死要好一点。可是,选择丧失一子的前提是必须决定丧失哪一个孩子,问题又回到了前面的那个两难选择。这位母亲出于本能死死抓住两个孩子的小手,一个也不肯放弃。枪响了,两个孩子应声倒毙。可以想象,这位母亲事后会悔恨不己,懊悔自己当时不够冷静,否则至少可以保住一个孩子了。事过境迂,她忘记了那个绝对无法选择的困境。
                          ------节选自周国平《妞妞---一个父亲的札记》
    10/21/2009

    无题

          不要对我说:苦难净化心灵,悲剧使人崇高。默默之中,苦难磨钝了多少敏感的心灵,悲剧毁灭了多少失意的英雄。何必用舞台上的绘声绘色,来掩盖生活中的无声无息!
              -------周国平 《妞妞-一个父亲的札记》
    10/18/2009

    生活在别处一

          昨日看到上虞曹娥江畔的烟花,持续半个小时,可能很美丽,因为看到的人很多。从来没有在这个江南小城看到过这么多人,仿佛一下子冒出来似的。我突然想到约翰.梅纳德.凯恩斯关于股市的选美理论:不是要选择你认为最美的,而是要选择在你看来别人认为最美的。可能这个烟花并不怎么样,但是因为其他人会去看人,所以你也跟着去看,仅此而已。
          昨晚的烟花在八点一刻就结束了,时间还早,就没让师兄送我回东关,以为可以打到车。不想这个小城的出租车实在少的可怜,回到住处已经快十一点了。途中和出租车师傅聊天,他以前是从物资局下岗的,属于改革开放的受损人,言辞中充满了对这个社会的不满。
          今天中午请小陈吃饭,之前只是电话中联系过,我不得不佩服女人的第六感觉,她先把我认出来的。
    10/16/2009

    要想把你忘记真的很难

    有些人
    似乎已经从我的世界里消失
    我的记忆里已经不存在这个人
    但是,在梦中的出现
    让我回忆起往事。
    没有刻意去忘记
    只是人生不再有交集
    可能曾经的痛苦与欢乐产生的印迹太深
    清空是奢望
    其实也没有打算清除
    只是希望把那部分记忆存放在隐藏文件夹中
     
     
    10/13/2009

    无聊、寂寞、孤独是三种不同的心境

          无聊是把自我消散于他人之中的欲望,它寻求的是消遣;寂寞是自我与他人共在的欲望,它寻求的是普通的人间温暖;孤独是把他人接纳到自我之中的欲望,它寻求的是理解。
      无聊者自厌,寂寞者自怜,孤独者自足。
      庸人无聊,天才孤独,人人都有寂寞的时光。
      无聊是喜剧性的,孤独是悲剧性的,寂寞是中性的。
      无聊属于生物性的人,寂寞属于社会性的人,孤独属于形而上的人。
                                                               ------周国平,《人与永恒》

    无题

    一切迷恋都凭借幻觉,
    一切理解都包含误解,
    一切忠诚都指望报答,
    一切牺牲都附有条件。

    Economic governance: the organization of cooperation

    12 October 2009

    The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has decided to award The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel for 2009 to

    Elinor Ostrom
    Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA,

    "for her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons"

    and

    Oliver E. Williamson
    University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA,

    "for his analysis of economic governance, especially the boundaries of the firm"

    Elinor Ostrom has demonstrated how common property can be successfully managed by user associations. Oliver Williamson has developed a theory where business firms serve as structures for conflict resolution. Over the last three decades these seminal contributions have advanced economic governance research from the fringe to the forefront of scientific attention.

    Economic transactions take place not only in markets, but also within firms, associations, households, and agencies. Whereas economic theory has comprehensively illuminated the virtues and limitations of markets, it has traditionally paid less attention to other institutional arrangements. The research of Elinor Ostrom and Oliver Williamson demonstrates that economic analysis can shed light on most forms of social organization.

    Elinor Ostrom has challenged the conventional wisdom that common property is poorly managed and should be either regulated by central authorities or privatized. Based on numerous studies of user-managed fish stocks, pastures, woods, lakes, and groundwater basins, Ostrom concludes that the outcomes are, more often than not, better than predicted by standard theories. She observes that resource users frequently develop sophisticated mechanisms for decision-making and rule enforcement to handle conflicts of interest, and she characterizes the rules that promote successful outcomes.

    Oliver Williamson has argued that markets and hierarchical organizations, such as firms, represent alternative governance structures which differ in their approaches to resolving conflicts of interest. The drawback of markets is that they often entail haggling and disagreement. The drawback of firms is that authority, which mitigates contention, can be abused. Competitive markets work relatively well because buyers and sellers can turn to other trading partners in case of dissent. But when market competition is limited, firms are better suited for conflict resolution than markets. A key prediction of Williamson's theory, which has also been supported empirically, is therefore that the propensity of economic agents to conduct their transactions inside the boundaries of a firm increases along with the relationship-specific features of their assets.

     

     

    10/12/2009

    Facts on the Prize in Economic Sciences

    In 1968, Sveriges Riksbank (Sweden's central bank) established this Prize in memory of Alfred Nobel, founder of the Nobel Prize. Here are some facts and figures regarding The Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, awarded from 1969 onwards. The 2009 Nobel Prize is not yet included.

    Number of Prizes in Economic Sciences

    40 Prizes in Economic Sciences have been awarded every year since 1969.

    22 Prizes in Economic Sciences have been given to one Laureate only.
    14 Prizes in Economic Sciences have been shared by two Laureates.
    4 Prizes in Economic Sciences have been shared between three Laureates.

    Number of Laureates in Economic Sciences

    62 individuals have been awarded since 1969.

    Youngest Laureate in Economic Sciences

    To date, the youngest Laureate in Economic Sciences is Kenneth J. Arrow, who was 51 years old when he was awarded in 1972.

    Oldest Laureate in Economic Sciences

    The oldest Laureate in Economic Sciences to date is Leonid Hurwicz, who was 90 years old when he was awarded in 2007. He is also the oldest Laureate to be awarded the Nobel Prize in all Prize areas.

    Women Laureates in Economic Sciences

    There have been no women Laureates in Economic Sciences so far.

    Multiple Laureates in Economic Sciences

    There have been no multiple Laureates in Economic Sciences.

    Posthumous Prizes in Economic Sciences

    There have been no posthumous Prizes in Economic Sciences. From 1974, the Statutes of the Nobel Foundation stipulate that a Prize cannot be awarded posthumously, unless death has occurred after the announcement of the Prize. Before 1974, the Nobel Prize has only been awarded posthumously twice: to Dag Hammarskjöld (Nobel Peace Prize 1961) and Erik Axel Karlfeldt (Nobel Prize in Literature 1931).

    Family Laureates in Economic Sciences

    Brothers:
    Jan Tinbergen
    (Economic Sciences in 1969) and Nikolaas Tinbergen (Physiology or Medicine in 1973)

     

    10/9/2009

    The Nobel Prize in Literature 2009 Herta Müller

    The Nobel Prize in Literature for 2009 is awarded to the German author Herta Müller

    "who, with the concentration of poetry and the frankness of prose, depicts the landscape of the dispossessed".

    Biobibliographical notes

    Herta Müller was born on August 17, 1953 in the German-speaking town Nitzkydorf in Banat, Romania. Her parents were members of the German-speaking minority in Romania. Her father had served in the Waffen SS during World War II. Many German Romanians were deported to the Soviet Union in 1945, including Müller's mother who spent five years in a work camp in present-day Ukraine. Many years later, in Atemschaukel (2009), Müller was to depict the exile of the German Romanians in the Soviet Union. From 1973 to 1976, Müller studied German and Romanian literature at the university in Timişoara (Temeswar). During this period, she was associated with Aktionsgruppe Banat, a circle of young German-speaking authors who, in opposition to Ceauşescu’s dictatorship, sought freedom of speech. After completing her studies, she worked as a translator at a machine factory from 1977 to 1979. She was dismissed when she refused to be an informant for the secret police. After her dismissal, she was harassed by Securitate.

    Müller made her debut with the collection of short stories Niederungen (1982), which was censored in Romania. Two years later, she published the uncensored version in Germany and, in the same year, Drückender Tango in Romania. In these two works, Müller depicts life in a small, German-speaking village and the corruption, intolerance and repression to be found there. The Romanian national press was very critical of these works while, outside of Romania, the German press received them very positively. Because Müller had publicly criticized the dictatorship in Romania, she was prohibited from publishing in her own country. In 1987, Müller emigrated together with her husband, author Richard Wagner.

    The novels Der Fuchs war damals schon der Jäger (1992), Herztier (1994; The Land of Green Plums, 1996) and Heute wär ich mir lieber nicht begegnet (1997; The Appointment, 2001) give, with chiselled details, a portrait of daily life in a stagnated dictatorship. Müller has given guest lectures at universities, colleges and other venues in Paderborn, Warwick, Hamburg, Swansea, Gainsville (Florida), Kassel, Göttingen, Tübingen and Zürich among other places. She lives in Berlin. Since 1995 she has served as a member of Deutsche Akademie für Sprache und Dichtung, in Darmstadt.

    10/8/2009

    The ribosome translates the DNA code into life

    Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge,
    United Kingdom

    Thomas A. Steitz, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA

    Ada E. Yonath, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel


    "for studies of the structure and function of the ribosome"

     

    The Nobel Prize in Chemistry for 2009 awards studies of one of life's core processes: the ribosome's translation of DNA information into life. Ribosomes produce proteins, which in turn control the chemistry in all living organisms. As ribosomes are crucial to life, they are also a major target for new antibiotics.

    This year's Nobel Prize in Chemistry awards Venkatraman Ramakrishnan, Thomas A. Steitz and Ada E. Yonath for having showed what the ribosome looks like and how it functions at the atomic level. All three have used a method called X-ray crystallography to map the position for each and every one of the hundreds of thousands of atoms that make up the ribosome.

    Inside every cell in all organisms, there are DNA molecules. They contain the blueprints for how a human being, a plant or a bacterium, looks and functions. But the DNA molecule is passive. If there was nothing else, there would be no life.

    The blueprints become transformed into living matter through the work of ribosomes. Based upon the information in DNA, ribosomes make proteins: oxygen-transporting haemoglobin, antibodies of the immune system, hormones such as insulin, the collagen of the skin, or enzymes that break down sugar. There are tens of thousands of proteins in the body and they all have different forms and functions. They build and control life at the chemical level.

    An understanding of the ribosome's innermost workings is important for a scientific understanding of life. This knowledge can be put to a practical and immediate use; many of today's antibiotics cure various diseases by blocking the function of bacterial ribosomes. Without functional ribosomes, bacteria cannot survive. This is why ribosomes are such an important target for new antibiotics.

    10/7/2009

    The masters of light

    Charles K. Kao
    Standard Telecommunication Laboratories, Harlow, UK, and Chinese University of Hong Kong

    "for groundbreaking achievements concerning the transmission of light in fibers for optical communication"

    and the other half jointly to

    Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith
    Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, USA

    "for the invention of an imaging semiconductor circuit – the CCD sensor"

    This year's Nobel Prize in Physics is awarded for two scientific achievements that have helped to shape the foundations of today’s networked societies. They have created many practical innovations for everyday life and provided new tools for scientific exploration. In 1966, Charles K. Kao made a discovery that led to a breakthrough in fiber optics. He carefully calculated how to transmit light over long distances via optical glass fibers. With a fiber of purest glass it would be possible to transmit light signals over 100 kilometers, compared to only 20 meters for the fibers available in the 1960s. Kao's enthusiasm inspired other researchers to share his vision of the future potential of fiber optics. The first ultrapure fiber was successfully fabricated just four years later, in 1970.

    Today optical fibers make up the circulatory system that nourishes our communication society. These low-loss glass fibers facilitate global broadband communication such as the Internet. Light flows in thin threads of glass, and it carries almost all of the telephony and data traffic in each and every direction. Text, music, images and video can be transferred around the globe in a split second.

    If we were to unravel all of the glass fibers that wind around the globe, we would get a single thread over one billion kilometers long – which is enough to encircle the globe more than 25 000 times – and is increasing by thousands of kilometers every hour.

    A large share of the traffic is made up of digital images, which constitute the second part of the award. In 1969 Willard S. Boyle and George E. Smith invented the first successful imaging technology using a digital sensor, a CCD (Charge-Coupled Device). The CCD technology makes use of the photoelectric effect, as theorized by Albert Einstein and for which he was awarded the 1921 year's Nobel Prize. By this effect, light is transformed into electric signals. The challenge when designing an image sensor was to gather and read out the signals in a large number of image points, pixels, in a short time.

    The CCD is the digital camera's electronic eye. It revolutionized photography, as light could now be captured electronically instead of on film. The digital form facilitates the processing and distribution of these images. CCD technology is also used in many medical applications, e.g. imaging the inside of the human body, both for diagnostics and for microsurgery.

    Digital photography has become an irreplaceable tool in many fields of research. The CCD has provided new possibilities to visualize the previously unseen. It has given us crystal clear images of distant places in our universe as well as the depths of the oceans.

    Read more about this year's prize
    Information for the Public
    Scientific Background (pdf)
    In order to read the text you need Acrobat Reader.
    Links and Further Reading
     

    Charles Kuen Kao, British and US citizen. Born 1933 in Shanghai, China. Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering 1965 from Imperial College London, UK. Director of Engineering at Standard Telecommunication Laboratories, Harlow, UK. Vice-chancellor, Chinese University of Hong Kong. Retired 1996.
    www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Oral-History:Charles_Kao

    Willard Sterling Boyle, Canadian and US citizen. Born 1924 in Amherst, NS, Canada. Ph.D. in Physics 1950 from McGill University, QC, Canada. Executive Director of Communication Sciences Division, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, USA. Retired 1979.
    www.science.ca/scientists/scientistprofile.php?pID=129

    George Elwood Smith, US citizen. Born 1930 in White Plains, NY, USA. Ph.D. in Physics 1959 from University of Chicago, IL, USA. Head of VLSI Device Department, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ, USA. Retired 1986.
    www.ieeeghn.org/wiki/index.php/Oral-History:George_E_Smith

    Prize amount: SEK 10 million. Kao is awarded one half, Boyle and Smith share the other half.

    10/6/2009

    Revealing the Mystery Ending

    Every cell in our bodies contains our entire genome, the blueprint for life, wrapped up within its chromosomes. Each time one of our cells divides to form two new cells, its chromosomes need to be perfectly replicated so that each new cell receives an exact copy of the blueprint. As early as the 1930s, long before the molecular nature of DNA was understood, people such as Hermann Muller and Barbara McClintock had noticed that the very ends of the chromosomes appeared to serve an important protective role. But what these ‘telomeres’, or end parts, actually were remained a mystery.

    The first great strides in unravelling telomere function, and understanding how they are maintained, were taken in the late 1970s and early 80s, and it is this work that the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine rewards. Elizabeth Blackburn used early DNA-sequencing techniques to show that telomeres were made up of short, repeated pieces of DNA. Next, she and Jack Szostak performed an experiment showing that telomeres from one species, a pond-dwelling single-celled organism called tetrahymena, could protect DNA molecules, or mini-chromosomes, from a very distant organism, yeast. The fact that this protective effect was conserved across such vast stretches of evolution told them that they were witnessing a very fundamental biological mechanism in action.

    Elizabeth Blackburn and her graduate student Carol Greider then went looking for the mechanism that maintains telomeres, and on Christmas day, 1984, discovered the first evidence for the enzyme telomerase. Combining both protein and RNA components, telomerase is a reverse transcriptase which adds telomere DNA to the ends of molecules using an RNA template. Its discovery presented a solution to one aspect of the puzzling 'end replication problem' which had confounded molecular biologists, who had been unable to understand how DNA could be added to the very tip of one of the two strands of replicating DNA during cell division. By providing, with its RNA, a template for DNA synthesis, telomerase is able to build a platform onto the end of the molecule from which other DNA-synthesizing enzymes can then operate.

    This is the 100th time the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine has been awarded, and the first time that any Nobel Prize in the sciences has been awarded to more than one woman. Telomere and telomerase disfunction is now linked with a number of disease states, and therapeutic approaches based upon targeting this system are in development.

    By Adam Smith, Editor-in-Chief, Nobelprize.org

     

    First published 5 October 2009
    10/5/2009

    Nobel prize will come

    Physiology or Medicine : October 5
    Physics                        : October 6
    Chemistry                    : October  7
    Literature                     : October  8
    Peace                          : October  9
    Economics Science       : October  12
    10/2/2009

    秋雨连绵

          细雨如丝、连绵不断,不知道什么时候开始,更不知道什么时候结束。曾经,最喜欢的是在毛毛细雨中散步,呼吸泥土的气息。欢乐和忧愁都已远去,只剩下眼前的如丝细雨。现在,雨中散步成为奢侈。
          时值中秋,雨过天晴,心情平添几分舒畅。